Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 03:01:38
Server time: 16:58:21, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | Autokrator30 | Klexi | Mbites2 | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Government Downsizing Act of 2554

Details

Submitted by[?]: Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2555

Description[?]:

We the DCD believe that the central government of Telamon spends too much and is too invasive into matters which should be either left to the states or the private sector. Especially in light of our 20 billion TPD deficit, we have targeted a multitude of programs which we believe should be either left to the states or completely privatized.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:44:14, April 01, 2008 CET
FromRightful Radical Party
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageThis bill won't get our acceptance.

Date21:59:03, April 01, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessagePerhaps the RRP would like to elaborate on their greivances or suggest revisions to the bill so we can draft a piece of passable legislation

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date23:59:39, April 01, 2008 CET
FromRadical Party
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe disagree with articles 2, 6 and 7.

But strongly support articles 1, 4, 5 and 8.

- Kristian Donson - Leader of the Radical Party

Date00:22:14, April 02, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe greatly appreciate the input of the Radical Party in regards to the amendment of this bill and will closely consider their stand upon our next revision.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date00:27:29, April 02, 2008 CET
FromSocial Democratic Party
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageThe overall federalist nature of this bill will cause us to vote yes to this bill. The privatization is something we would like to overturn in the future, but want for federalism over-rules our disgust for privatization.

Date01:34:21, April 02, 2008 CET
FromRepublican Party
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageThis bill will garner the Republican Party support.

Date01:53:30, April 02, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe will not vote in favor of this bill. We adamantly oppose articles 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 8.
-Roger Evars COM Party Leader

Date02:16:26, April 02, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe have revised this bill according to feedback from the Radical and COM parties, and we hope that the revisions are to their liking.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date03:06:11, April 02, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe cannot support articles 3 and 5.
-Roger Evars, COM Party Leader

Date04:25:57, April 02, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageArticles 3 and 5 have been repealed from the bill in response to COM party feedback. We hope that the COM party will support this revised proposal.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

Date06:52:49, April 02, 2008 CET
FromConservative Ordo Malleus (COM)
ToDebating the Government Downsizing Act of 2554
MessageWe appreciate the willingness of the DCD to initiate change in their legislation. Unfortunately, article 2 prevents our support. If we supported this bill we'd only have to sponsor a bill reverting the change in article 2 back to the old position. That would be a waste of time, effort, and money for all involved. We wish to avoid the waste by not supporting this article as it stands.

If it were to come before Parliament with only articles 1 and 3 there is a reasonable chance that we would support it. Until then we regretfully cannot condone a bill that proposes such drastic change to our national museums. It is bad enough that our libraries suffered the uncalled for cut. Our national museums needn't suffer the same fate.
-Roger Evars, COM Party Leader

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 99

no
  

Total Seats: 151

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: By default the head of government is the ultimate authority within a national government. In general terms, heads of government are expected to consult with cabinet colleagues (including those from other parties) before making significant decisions but they remain responsible for government action.

Random quote: "I have opinions of my own - strong opinions. But I don't always agree with them." - George W. Bush

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 87