Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: February 5481
Next month in: 00:05:19
Server time: 23:54:40, May 09, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Civil Freedom Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Mordusian Libertarian Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2112

Description[?]:

As a government we should protect the civil liberties of our nation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:25:19, September 15, 2005 CET
FromMordusian Libertarian Alliance
ToDebating the Civil Freedom Act
MessageWe would like your imput, please tell us if you find anything objectionable, and please explain why.

Date21:48:57, September 15, 2005 CET
FromPeople's National Party
ToDebating the Civil Freedom Act
MessageOnce more another attempt to corrupt this nations moral fibre by the Liberal's and Socialist's. How will it make this nation any better if prostitute's are allowed to roam our neighbourhoods? How will it make this nation any better if fathers become addicted to gambling and cannot maintain their families? How will it make this nation any better if groups of rowdy youths are allowed free reign to terrorise locals without the police being able to do anything?

And do not even get us started on the proposals to remove a Judge's ability to track individuals! How on earth can we tackle terrorism if our law enforcement agencies are not even allowed to monitor dangerous individuals? It's insane!

This shouldn't be named the 'Civil Freedom Act' it should be named the 'Criminal Freedom Act'!


Date00:08:43, September 16, 2005 CET
FromMordusian Libertarian Alliance
ToDebating the Civil Freedom Act
MessageMy dear friend. Let me first address the issue of your rather ignorant accusation, of calling me a Socialist. For your information, socialism is perhaps the exact opposit of what my party stands for. I do sincerly apologize however for not making the fact that I am a libertarian clear. I, being the fool that I was, thought that by putting the term LIBERTARIAN in my party's name and description that it would inform literate people of my party's political ideology. Apearently I was wrong and for this I am deeply sorry. But perhaps you are confusing the term libertarian with the term socialism. Now I pray that I don't insult your inteligence and infinitly deep wisdom but I shall point out that Socialism and Libertarianism are exact opposits on the Political spectrum. DEFINITION OF SOCIALISM: Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy
DEFINITION OF LIBERTARIANISM: One who advocates maximizing individual rights and minimizing the role of the state
Also I shall point out that socialism only refers to economic matters, and this bill relates to civil freedoms.

Finaly, I must express my extreem fear of the future of our nation. If the party which wants to make governmnet a "Moral Authority" can't even distinguish between Libertarianism and Socialism then I daresay that we are in for one rough ride.

Anyway, I hope that your vastly deep fountain of intelect didn't just suffer a cataclysmic event and actually have to think. A good day to you.

Date19:41:05, September 16, 2005 CET
FromPeople's National Party
ToDebating the Civil Freedom Act
MessageAs Shakespeare once said "a rose by any other name would smell just as sweet"; Well a socialist by any other name is just as treacherous. But we're not here to debate over whether your party is socialist or liberal, rather we are here to debate this bill and the fact that you have answered none of our concerns indicates that there is no defence for the reckless proposals put forward here.

I sincerely hope that for the moral good of this nation that this bill is defeated.

Date11:11:37, September 17, 2005 CET
FromMordusian Inclusion Party
ToDebating the Civil Freedom Act
Message1: I don't agree with this. The police should be allowed to break up mobs.
2: I've spent far too long to bring that bill in to give it up.
3: I'm a bit iffy on this one. Legalising gambling will cause a problem.
4: There are many cases where privacy must be removed to ensure the safety of the people. However, the use of irrelevant information should be outlawed.
5: Hmm, there are prostitutes already, and most of them would be diseased by now. Would legalising prostitution counter the spread of infection?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 0

no
  

Total Seats: 254

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Players must never be asked for their Particracy password. This includes Moderation; a genuine Moderator will never ask for your password.

Random quote: "A conservative is a man who sits and thinks, mostly sits." - Woodrow Wilson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 76