We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Increasing the Private sector
Details
Submitted by[?]: Capitalistic Liberal Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2556
Description[?]:
| We belive its important to have the right to choose so we want private and public power stations to exist side by side and we should not interfere what services the private post office has to offer. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on energy generation.
Old value:: All power stations are publicly owned.
Current: Small scale private electrical generation is permitted but most energy is generated by a government-owned company.
Proposed: Private and public power stations exist side-by-side.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Current: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office. Private post office agencies are allowed to exist, and the services provided by them are not regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:58:10, April 03, 2008 CET | From |  Capitalistic Liberal Front | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | Please post your opinion, we can also compromice offcourse. |
| Date | 14:44:53, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Academics Party | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | I wonder why this hasn't been put up for debate before. This proposal makes sence in every way. We agree |
| Date | 20:20:14, April 03, 2008 CET | From | Christian Falangist Party | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | We will support this bill, though we don't believe it goes quite far enough. It is a step in the right direction. |
| Date | 02:23:36, April 04, 2008 CET | From | United Freedom Party | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | Why do we need privatized enterprises where public ones already exist? It seems it'd just cause confusion and redundancy. Having entities like these withoiut supervision and regulation is not a safe idea. |
| Date | 07:36:20, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Socialist Worker's Party | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | This is a decent compormise. Also, state monopolies are never good. This bill has our support! |
| Date | 10:44:57, April 04, 2008 CET | From | Capitalistic Liberal Front | To | Debating the Increasing the Private sector |
| Message | Thank you SWP. And united freedom party, this is because people should be able to choose for themself. Some may prefer the public ones and some may prefer the private ones. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 161 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 97 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it. |
| Random quote: "Wherever you have an efficient government, you have a dictatorship." - Harry S. Truman |