Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5474
Next month in: 01:45:26
Server time: 02:14:33, April 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Reform of Civil Liberties

Details

Submitted by[?]: Chidan Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2556

Description[?]:

To protect the right of a citizen to defend his/her name and reputation.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date06:01:42, April 05, 2008 CET
From Endralon Confederates Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageI don't see why you should be able to sue over things that are true. If factual statements are being made, then I don't see how legal action is justified.

Date08:34:01, April 05, 2008 CET
From New Liberal Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageAs long as the burden of proof lies with the slanderer, we don't see why people should be able to sue over true statements.

This is just ridiculous, what is the CP playing at?

Date14:34:30, April 05, 2008 CET
From Chidan Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageThe CP is defending the right of a citizen to defend their reputation and not have their name slandered and dragged through the media at every possible opportunity. We believe in protecting the dignity and allowing for the equal treatment of all the citizens of Endralon. That, is what we are playing at.

Date23:55:44, April 05, 2008 CET
From Endralon Confederates Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageI wasn't aware it was slander if it was true?


Date00:29:32, April 06, 2008 CET
From Chidan Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageTechnically no, but you know what I mean. No one has the right to invade the privacy of another.

Date07:13:19, April 06, 2008 CET
From Endralon Confederates Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
Message"Technically no, but you know what I mean."

Not..really..lol..

I don't see how reporting something truthful is invading their privacy. Sure if the information was acquired through some invasion of privacy, I could see that, but this doesn't stop that.

Date13:38:24, April 06, 2008 CET
From New Liberal Party of Endralon
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageSurely in that situation the person being sued could make a counter claim over the privacy issue.

Date15:45:04, April 06, 2008 CET
From Chidan Party
ToDebating the Reform of Civil Liberties
MessageBasically I misused the term "slander" to have a more general meaning, relating to one individual damaging the name of another, be it truth or otherwise. Replace "damaged" with "slandered" and hopefully my statement will be more coherent. I stand by the belief that my proposal is a step towards protecting the privacy of the citizens of Endralon from the harmful, malicious force that is the media and others who wish to damage their reputation.
If I separated this proposal, and put forward Article 1alone, would each party still vote no?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 170

no
    

Total Seats: 535

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: In general, role-play requires the consent of all players.

Random quote: "Popular suffrage is in itself no guarantee of freedom. People can vote themselves into slavery." - Frank Chodorov

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64