We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Right to Privacy Resolution 50
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2557
Description[?]:
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Right to privacy.
Old value:: Individuals have a right to privacy, but the courts can force individuals to give information on certain matters if needed. (also known as Habeas Data).
Current: Individuals have a right to privacy, to keep records and information for themselves.
Proposed: The government has the right to monitor information of individuals without letting them know.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 07:55:49, April 05, 2008 CET | From |  Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Resolution 50 |
| Message | In the interests of common decency on behalf of other parties whose members have pressing committee responsibilities we ask if it would be possible for the senators from the FRP to congeal or compress this cornucopia of endless leglislation mcnuggets into some easier to vote on. The docket becomes particularly full. Senate Warden Harold Belisarius |
| Date | 08:04:44, April 05, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Resolution 50 |
| Message | OOC: Run your party as you see fit, and I shall mine. I had and have the proposals to do it and no rules withstand it. Taking it in-game, a bit silly if you ask me. |
| Date | 15:29:27, April 05, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party of Solentia | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Resolution 50 |
| Message | The FRP once again infringes upon the civil rights of Solentia's citizens. It is clear now that the current administration is one no less inclined to totalitarianism than the last FRP administration. James Devreau, Inner Party Leader |
| Date | 15:58:07, April 05, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Right to Privacy Resolution 50 |
| Message | The Conservative Party would do well to pay attention to the citizens of Solentia. Versus laying platitudes out there against those he finds physically discomforting. It is the will of the people that has prompted this initiative. "No less inclined to totalitarianism." It's statements like this that the Conservative Party will inevitably regret having said. It is quite alright with the F.R.P. that you vote against this as it will only hurt you in the long-run for your continued opposition to the will of Solentians. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 171 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 254 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "The liberal state is a mask behind which there is no face; it is a scaffolding behind which there is no building." - Benito Mussolini |