We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Service Reform Act of 2559
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2559
Description[?]:
In order to better facilitate in the current absences by some parties and to further enable a spirited debate on a coalition government. We would encourage our colleagues to at the least, give this their deepest consideration. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 36
Current: 72
Proposed: 41
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:37:44, April 10, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Service Reform Act of 2559 |
Message | We are looking into this seriously. We cannot achieve a party consensus, yet. -SRNP Triumvirate |
Date | 19:42:17, April 10, 2008 CET | From | Solentian People Party | To | Debating the Civil Service Reform Act of 2559 |
Message | We believe and have done for some time, in pushing forward a serious agenda for this issue. Longer periods of time for more legislation to go through the senate and for discussions to take place and for a true reflection at election time on the record of the governing party. Martha Wheatdale, PP Leader and Whip |
Date | 19:50:58, April 10, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Civil Service Reform Act of 2559 |
Message | We would like to thank those who have voted yes on this proposal thus far; it is for the best for our Republic. With the new era we are in, time shouldn't be so rushed. Diplomacy takes time, as we all know and in supporting this-you are supporting the aforementioned notions and premise. The F.R.P. thanks the People Party, the Autocratic Nationalist Front and hopefully others soon enough. Party Spokesman of the F.R.P. Ron Seigler |
Date | 00:28:34, April 11, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Service Reform Act of 2559 |
Message | We vote yes, in the understanding we will see how this works out and may submit leglislation attempting to revert if we find it unfavorable. |
Date | 01:16:44, April 11, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Civil Service Reform Act of 2559 |
Message | The Federal Republican Party thanks our friends from the S.R.N.P. in their support of this measure. We also agree, we shall try this out and will-should it not fit within reason; support a repeal of this measure. Party Spokesman of the F.R.P. Ron Seigler |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes |
Total Seats: 283 | |||||
no | Total Seats: 142 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
Random quote: "Men's natures are alike, it is their habits that carry them far apart." - Confucius |