We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.129.2560
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2560
Description[?]:
Positioning. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Racial segregation of public amenities (eg. drinking fountains, public toilets)
Old value:: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Current: Segregation of any public amenity is banned.
Proposed: All public amenities are segregated.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government position in respect to crossdressing policy.
Old value:: Crossdressing is allowed.
Current: Crossdressing is allowed.
Proposed: Crossdressing is prohibited by the state.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The legality of divorces (if marriages are recognised).
Old value:: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Current: Divorces are legal, be it mutual consent, grounded cause or if one partner wants it.
Proposed: Only divorces that comply with religious doctrine are legal.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The legality of interracial sex.
Old value:: Interracial sex is legal.
Current: Interracial sex is legal.
Proposed: Interracial sex is completely illegal.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Current: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Proposed: Public nudity is illegal and prosecuted as a civil offence.
Article 6
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Current: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Proposed: All public displays of affection are illegal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:36:31, April 12, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.129.2560 |
Message | GRRR. Write bills you would vote for! |
Date | 13:48:29, April 12, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the DSP.129.2560 |
Message | I would if there were any civil rights things that were, ya know being oppressed, but there are'nt so I have to do this instead. |
Date | 21:55:07, April 12, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.129.2560 |
Message | CP does not oppose contra bills. It does oppose large bills. CP is not impressed by DSP's actions. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||||||
no |
Total Seats: 600 | |||||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Cultural Protocol bills must provide a real-life equivalent or short description for the ethnic groups, languages and religions contained in them, such that it would be easy for an unfamiliar player to understand (e.g. "Dundorfian = German"). Where appropriate, they should also provide guidance to players on where to find help with translations and character names. This might include, for example, links to Google Translate, Behind the Name's Random Name Generator and Fantasy Name Generators. |
Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle |