We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of July 2111
Details
Submitted by[?]: Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2112
Description[?]:
| This is our cabinet after a most...interesting election. |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 3
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 4
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 5
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 6
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Article 7
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan
Article 8
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Liberal Patriots' League
Article 9
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Kalistani Workers Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:21:36, September 16, 2005 CET | From | People's Front of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | NOOOOO D: |
| Date | 18:06:25, September 16, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | You have one position. This is commensurate with your power. |
| Date | 07:44:44, September 17, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | More then 50% can be reached with either the LCP or the KWP. We request one be removed so the rest of us can gain more positions--- otherwise we will vote this down. |
| Date | 08:29:08, September 17, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | The LCP and the KWP have agreed that if either is removed we will BOTH vote down the proposal. |
| Date | 22:25:56, September 17, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | We would like to register our distaste with this cabinet, and our irritation at the LCP and KWP. 4 parties never makes an efficient cabinet. |
| Date | 06:32:19, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | What is inefficient about power sharing? I suppose the LPK would prefer dictatorships as long as they were efficient? I am still considering. I feel a little cheated that I lose two ministries, after winning an extra 13 seats. |
| Date | 06:37:58, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Neo-Libertarian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | Thanks for taking our comment to the utter extreme. No, we wouldn't prefer a dictatorship, and we fought a Kalistani dictatorship for 20 years, in the form of the NSP. Dictatorships are autocratic freedom-slaying incarnate. We just want to make sure that the cabinet, a COALITITION OF BINDING, CO-OPERATING PARTNERS, by definition, should be AS EFFICIENT AS POSSIBLE. |
| Date | 08:41:38, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of July 2111 |
| Message | Why can't we be free under a dictator? Anyway, who said largely shared power is inefficient. I have seen papers to suggest it is more efficient. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 141 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 19 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 53 |
| Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/ |
| Random quote: "How much more grievous are the consequences of anger than the causes of it." - Marcus Aurelius |