We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Pet Registration Act of May 2560
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2562
Description[?]:
| Local governments shall carry files of pets in their region. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the ownership of domestic animals as pets.
Old value:: There are no laws regarding domestic animal ownership.
Current: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Proposed: People must register domestic animals with the local government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:17:54, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Partie d'Isolationnisme | To | Debating the Pet Registration Act of May 2560 |
| Message | Why? |
| Date | 02:57:50, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Pet Registration Act of May 2560 |
| Message | Really? Think about it! |
| Date | 04:53:00, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Union Hosienne-Démocrate (UHD) | To | Debating the Pet Registration Act of May 2560 |
| Message | So let us get this straight ... you are against local governments knowing and regulating the number and health of domestic pets? We really don't see a problem with local governments ensuring that animals have the proper shots, are taken care of properly and are not living in a house with 400 other animals. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 56 | ||
| no | Total Seats: 209 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 235 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical." - Thomas Jefferson |