We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Weapons Possessions Act of 2560
Details
Submitted by[?]: Libertarian Party of Talmoria
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2561
Description[?]:
| We oppose all laws at any level of government restricting, regulating or requiring the ownership of firearms or ammunition. Our people have the right to own any type of weapon for the purpose of self-defense from Individuals and/or Government. When our people own weapons, we believe that it will deter crime from never happening. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Weapons allowed to private citizens.
Old value:: Only certain types of weapons may be owned by the general public, but these may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Current: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Proposed: Citizens may own any type of weapon. They may be carried anywhere except as determined by the property owner.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:18:02, April 13, 2008 CET | From |  Peoples Change Party | To | Debating the Weapons Possessions Act of 2560 |
| Message | but then they might revolt |
| Date | 17:49:55, April 13, 2008 CET | From | Libertarian Party of Talmoria | To | Debating the Weapons Possessions Act of 2560 |
| Message | It is the Governments responsibility not to give any reason for its people to revolt. If there are revolts, then we can be assured that our people, who decide to own a weapon, are going to protect themselves and possibly their neighbors against any menace. The government would also send troops to assist our police officers and control the revolt. |
| Date | 13:11:56, April 14, 2008 CET | From | Peoples' Fist Party | To | Debating the Weapons Possessions Act of 2560 |
| Message | While normally we praise the rights of the individual, we think it poses a significant safety risk to allow all types of weapons to be made available. Thus, we oppose. |
| Date | 03:09:46, April 15, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Party | To | Debating the Weapons Possessions Act of 2560 |
| Message | but then they might revolt Isn't that a sign the government needs to change? Still, I oppose this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 84 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 247 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 169 |
| Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time. |
| Random quote: "I bet their mothers don't love them. Many Trigunian women are so cold. I mean it's a racist hellhole in parts." - Tirza Sommer, former Dorvish politician |