Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5484
Next month in: 01:50:20
Server time: 18:09:39, May 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: The 2/3 Act of 2560

Details

Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Social Democratic Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2561

Description[?]:

This will create a standard law for all the legislatures of the Republika Dumas that for all laws that are required to have a 2/3 majority on the national level, are required to have a 2/3 majority on the local levels.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:54:55, April 14, 2008 CET
FromDeltárska Ľudova Strana
ToDebating the The 2/3 Act of 2560
MessageWe believe that the local Dumas should decide. Why should the national Duma be telling local Dumas what to do?

Date00:11:27, April 15, 2008 CET
FromPaula Abdu Party
ToDebating the The 2/3 Act of 2560
MessageIn the name of Paula Adbu!

Date02:13:11, April 15, 2008 CET
FromDeltarian Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the The 2/3 Act of 2560
MessageTo ensure that the rights of everyone will be protected. We need to ensure that so as just because of a small changing of the guard the entire establishment will not be overturned.

Date05:18:38, April 15, 2008 CET
FromDobré Podnikatelia
ToDebating the The 2/3 Act of 2560
MessageI can't believe it, the DSDP and I worked so hard (sarcasm) on this unifying bill and now it will fail?

Date05:23:24, April 15, 2008 CET
FromDeltarian Social Democratic Party
ToDebating the The 2/3 Act of 2560
MessageI firmly believe that there are some regulations needed for the local Dumas, so as to assure dictatorship of the simple majority in one area. Ex. We should not have a simple majority law for a motto, because if a communist makes it there then the motto will be "workers of the world unite" and the next election it could be won by a facist and it could be "we will kill the dissenters". But what we need is a unifying example for the entire nation, thats why laws such as flags, mottos, animals, should all have a unifying factor that is a representative of all. Not some, hence why its more than the simple majority, but at least 2/3.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 29

no
   

Total Seats: 42

abstain
  

Total Seats: 29


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "Conservative, n: A statesman who is enamored of existing evils, as distinguished from the Liberal who wishes to replace them with others." - Ambrose Bierce

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 56