We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: "Exotic"...
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sezoka Heiwa Zenshona Seito
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2561
Description[?]:
Why can't people own colorful parrots if they wish to? If the species isn't endangered and the trade is regulated then there's no reason to totally ban it. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of exotic animals.
Old value:: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Current: Only zoos or zoological institutions are allowed to keep exotic animals.
Proposed: Everyone may keep exotic animals, but the trade in exotic animals is regulated by the government.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 00:59:16, April 15, 2008 CET | From | Kiwamete Tekido Kessha | To | Debating the "Exotic"... |
Message | WHY??!?! |
Date | 06:31:45, April 15, 2008 CET | From | Sezoka Heiwa Zenshona Seito | To | Debating the "Exotic"... |
Message | Seriously can anyone explain why they would vote no on this? It's not right to keep people from owning exotic animals if they wish to! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 500 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Moderation will not implement nation renaming requests where the proposed name does not comply with the requirements set out in the Nation Renaming Guide: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6364 |
Random quote: "The one bonus of not lifting the ban on gays in the military is that the next time the government mandates a draft we can all declare homosexuality instead of running off to Canada." - Lorne Bloch |