Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: June 5461
Next month in: 00:07:41
Server time: 15:52:18, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | SE33 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Decentralization Act of 2563

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2564

Description[?]:

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:34:23, April 18, 2008 CET
From Solentian People Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageArticle 1 and Article 3- not preparing for war and having no policy on nuclear power? Have you lost your mind?


Date20:42:15, April 18, 2008 CET
From Federal Republican Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageWe're preparing for war?

Date20:43:26, April 18, 2008 CET
From Federal Republican Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageI'd ask the Senate Warden and the F.I.P. about that-I can't speak for them and their plans to go to war? I thought I was the warmonger so, if they've got an agenda to start a war that you are aware of-I assure you I am not.

Party Spokesman,
Ron Seigler

Date22:02:25, April 18, 2008 CET
From Solentian People Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageI meant Article 1doesn't make any provisions in case there is a war or we do go to war which nearly happened under the FRP administration. It seems ironic, that it is the same party who is now preparing for us to stop making any form of civil defence, when we were verging on a war and an invasion of our borders when they occupied the presidency. So where do they stand?

Martha Wheatdale, PP Leader and Whip

Date23:08:38, April 18, 2008 CET
From Federal Republican Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageOOC: It isn't my fault Article 1 is like it is; go look at it. Don't accuse me of in-game "warmongering" or this and that when the actual game does allow for such options when proposing such items. Though I appreciate your clarification.

Date01:20:37, April 19, 2008 CET
From Solentian People Party
ToDebating the Decentralization Act of 2563
MessageWell actually I am sure there are other options to - The Government makes no provision for Civil Defence.

We need to have constant practices in place to ensure our borders are protected in case we are ever attacked, you didn't have to choose this one, you could of chosen another more suitable one. Therefore, I cannot accuse you of the game options for legislation (not that I or anyone else did) but I can hold you responsible for the proposal here which you chose yourself and undermines civil defence in our country and what my party disagrees with. My party is against war, but for supporting our country and having measures in place in case the need for war arises and is impossible to stop.

Martha Wheatdale, PP Leader/Whip

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 91

no
      

Total Seats: 334

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "Envy is the cause of political division." - Democritus

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 62