Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5484
Next month in: 00:03:59
Server time: 11:56:00, May 16, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): JVTA | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Greater Representation Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Classical Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2115

Description[?]:

To establish more seats in the HoD in order to provide for greater representation for the people by making the areas Delegates represent smaller and increasing their numbers.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:56:32, September 17, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageWe'd be willing to rise/lower 250, but 100 is extremely low. It looks like only two parties with seat s are actually participating, so we may want to call for elections after this passes, if it does.

Date15:59:40, September 17, 2005 CET
FromRadical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
Messagewe tried this bill a while ago. To many inactive parties for it to pass

Date17:43:43, September 17, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageIf we called for early elections would we be able to unseat the inactive parties?

Date18:20:11, September 17, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageWe'd only need the Region's Rights Movement (the only inactive party with seats) to lose like 4-5 seats and we'll have the 68 votes (2/3 of 100) needed to get this passed.

Date00:22:37, September 18, 2005 CET
FromAldurian Communist Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageWe will support an initiative to increase the number of seats.

Date01:46:12, September 18, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageA cal for early elections as been made. The Aldurian Communist Party as already voted aye. We urge the Radical Liberal Party to vote aye as well. If they do, elections will take place. We only need the RRM to lose 4 or 5 seats to have a 2/3 majority, and will thus be able to increase the size of the legislature.

Date05:43:54, September 18, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageWell, the early elections changed nothing. I will leave this debate open until a time when we have a 2/3 majority.

Date02:24:55, September 22, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageThe Region's Rights Movement has been inactive for 7 days. As such, I have reported it to the admins. Its account should be deleted shortly and its seats distributed in the next election. That means that we will finally be able to pass an amendment to increase the number of seats in our legislative body.

Date14:49:29, September 22, 2005 CET
FromClassical Liberal Party
ToDebating the Greater Representation Act
MessageThe Region's Rights Movement has deleted. This will now proceed to a vote.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 62

no
 

Total Seats: 0

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Parties have the ability to endorse another party's candidate for the Head of State election (if there is one). This adds a strategic element to the elections.

Random quote: "In America today, you can murder land for private profit. You can leave the corpse for all to see, and nobody calls the cops." - Paul Brooks

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 57