We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Supreme Presidential Cabinet 2564 - 2565
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Independent Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2565
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Meritocratic Alliance
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Independent Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Meritocratic Alliance
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Meritocratic Alliance
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Federal Independent Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Solentian People Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Meritocratic Alliance
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Solentian People Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Solentian People Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:29:45, April 22, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Supreme Presidential Cabinet 2564 - 2565 |
| Message | From the Offices of the F.R.P; It comes as quite a surprise to the party leadership within the F.R.P. that the Federal Independent Party that encourages liberty and bipartisanship proposes such an absurd cabinet. It was the last election, when the F.R.P. won it's fourth-term despite all of the Heritage Coalition's efforts that Supreme President Naveed reached out to Mr. Avan of the F.I.P. to propose a coalition government in which all parties could present their case. The F.R.P. agreed and naturally, the F.I.P. contributed absolutely nothing to the debate. In our proposal we included nearly all parties. . . Your leadership is vile and contemptible. You say one thing and do another. You dare endorse a racist and bigoted party such as the S.R.N.P. to be your Head of Government. I think this proposal should have been entitled, "The Heritage Coalition's Bunker Proposal" as that is what it is. I wish you the best of luck in passing this incompetent and grossly ignorant cabinet. Coming from a party that desires higher-dialogue and less bickering-this is the best move you could have made, eh? I would presume to not get a reply as the F.I.P. when it power deems it appropriate to reply to what they desire and if they grace us with their wisdom it is selectively. Signed, F.R.P. Spokesman, Ron Seigler |
| Date | 04:37:25, April 22, 2008 CET | From | Solentian Cosmopolitan Party | To | Debating the Supreme Presidential Cabinet 2564 - 2565 |
| Message | I may be new to the nation but this doesn't seem like a very fair cabinet given the proportion of seats and from what I've seen the F.R.P. has a point about his last cabinet. Why such animosity? |
| Date | 06:06:28, April 22, 2008 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Supreme Presidential Cabinet 2564 - 2565 |
| Message | History will prove that it was Senate Warden Harold Belisarius who managed to hold government together during the tumultuous Naveed years. We are honored to continue to have him as Head of Government, and we urge parties to cease this divisive bickering. If you don't like the SRNP, don't join, but you insult over 20 million voters at your own detriment. Sam Sloan, SRNP Exarch |
| Date | 08:07:46, April 22, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party | To | Debating the Supreme Presidential Cabinet 2564 - 2565 |
| Message | It doesn't take history to recognize Mr. Belisarius is a member of a radical party that supports the enslavement of his own fellow Solentians, no regard for the disabled and absolutely convinced that the spineless leadership of the F.I.P. has ever yielded anything of substance to this nation. It's further telling these two polar-opposite parties are so closely attached at the hip. It begs the question of where loyalties lie and who is pandering to whom. The F.R.P. doesn't believe in the politics of the past. We proudly read and comprehend and respond in turn to any sensible questions and actively have promoted international agreements, a sound budget, a grade-A military and a government more attuned to the peoples of Solentia. Clearly, there are obvious differences between the F.R.P. and the F.I.P. One is the party of ideas and the latter; the party of no ideas. Furthermore, the F.R.P. thanks those who will be supporting us and those who have in the past supported the honorable Ulrich Naveed. Party Spokesman, Ron Seigler |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 281 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 114 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
| Random quote: "The man who prefers his country before any other duty shows the same spirit as the man who surrenders every right to the state. They both deny that right is superior to authority." - John Dalberg-Acton |