Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 01:51:06
Server time: 06:08:53, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): ADM Drax | blowingnorthwind | hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2566

Description[?]:

Based on results from the election results from February 2565. (http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewnews.php?newsid=158627)


1. DSP > 135/600 = 0.225 * 13 = 2.925 -> 3
2. CP > 93/600 = 0.155 * 13 = 2.015 -> 2
3. NPP > 92/600 = 0.1533 * 13 = 1.9933 -> 2
4. AUP > 86/600 = 0.1433 * 13 = 1.8633 -> 2
5. USMC > 80/600 = 0.1333 * 13 = 1.733 -> 2
6. SCP > 65/600 = 0.1083 * 13 = 1.4083 -> 1
7. PSFA > 49/600 = 0.0817 * 13 = 1.0617 -> 1
8. LGP > 0/600 = 0.0 * 13 = 0.0 -> 0


as per Proportional Cabinet bill by IC: http://80.237.164.51/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=183773

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:34:53, April 23, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageI do not think it would be wise to switch Defence Ministers in the middle of a crisis.

Date03:47:32, April 23, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageThe Office of Tenno does not see the current situation as been a crisis. We have an invader (CUP) in our land who will be removed by force and the dispute with the Jews and their meaningless threats is harmless. Stability within Sekowo is excellent. There are no changes in military leadership, just the liaison between the Folkstmma and the Federal Armed Forces of Sekowo.

If Pan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance wishes to give up the position to the USMC, they may publicly state that here and in response, a new cabinet will be proposed with Defence and Justice switched. Otherwise, the current cabinet stays.

Date05:56:17, April 23, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWe demand a more useful seat.

Date05:57:25, April 23, 2008 CET
FromPan-Sekowo Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWe feel we can handle the current defense climate, as us and USMC bring a similiar approach to many issues, and have a good record of coperation in the past. We ask them to trust us now

Date05:58:05, April 23, 2008 CET
FromSekowan Communist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWe find this proportional representation bollocks to be merely a way to coerce the revolutionary left into compliance and as such will be boycotting it until we can get a cabinet seat that is more than a sinecure.

Date06:05:59, April 23, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageSCP, you have only expressed interest in the finance position. Anything else?

Date06:12:08, April 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWell, fact of the matter is the entire legislature supported the bill allowing proportional legislature...

Date06:13:47, April 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWe would hate to see the SCP and USMC debar themselves from the cabinet.

Date06:15:16, April 23, 2008 CET
FromNormand Pluralist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
Message(BTW, we would gladly trade Infrastructure)

Date06:15:25, April 23, 2008 CET
From帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageWe would remind the SCP that the CP is well within its jurisdiction to exclude the SCP for blocking the passing of the cabinet.

Date07:24:11, April 23, 2008 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageCP is aware. But like NPP said, it would be nice if everyone can be included.

Date01:12:20, April 24, 2008 CET
FromRevolutionary State Socialist Party
ToDebating the Sekowan Cabinet Proposal of 2565
MessageOOC: I have all the current war plans though, IE where I've deployed the various things for war, in quite a nice series of maps.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 455

no
 

Total Seats: 65

abstain
  

Total Seats: 80


Random fact: After 3 days (72 hours) your account will be inactivated by Moderation. If you want to be reactivated you can request reactivation located here: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4360

Random quote: "A claim for equality of material position can be met only by a government with totalitarian powers." - Friedrich Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78