Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5477
Next month in: 02:45:11
Server time: 01:14:48, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of January 2566

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2566

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:41:33, April 24, 2008 CET
FromFederalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageA capitalist cabinet consisting of the Elitaare Nasionaal Partey, the Constitution Party, and the Federalist Party, to undo some of the damage the socialist government has done.

Date07:56:54, April 24, 2008 CET
FromAgrarian Party of Mordusia
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageThe Elitaare Nasionaal Partey is not demanding eight seats in the cabinet and is not convinced this gives a fair resemblance of parliament majority; also, it was hoping to obtain the ministry of finance (with which it has a long tradition) in order to sort out the budget.

The ENP also wishes to add it does not generally support "capitalist" or "socialist" cabinets, but unitary ones.

It also denies being a "capitalist" party since the elite theory understanding of society ultimately rejects phantasms like "capitalism" and "socialism". This is all based on Lombasianism, on which the party is founded.

However, given the need for reforms is, well, now, we vote in favor.

Date08:20:43, April 24, 2008 CET
FromFederalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageYes, we are willing to finetune this cabinet to meet more unitary needs once sanity has been restored.

Date13:15:33, April 24, 2008 CET
FromConstitution Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageI'm voting no because I don't think that the representation is fair.

Date18:58:43, April 24, 2008 CET
FromFederalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageGeez... you all like to share.

Date18:59:14, April 24, 2008 CET
FromFederalist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of January 2566
MessageApparently no one here has read The Prince :)

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 96

no
    

Total Seats: 159

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Bill descriptions must be in English, or at least include a full English translation. Bill titles may appear in a language that is appropriate to the nation and are not required to be translated into English.

    Random quote: "The only place where democracy comes before work is in the dictionary." - Ralph Nader

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 52