We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nationalization Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: CIVIL UNION
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2113
Description[?]:
| As a gesture towards or patriotic leftist friends, we want to nationalize all housing. If the State provides housing, there will be more equality for every Dolgarian. Considering homosexuality, we'd like to see it banned from our military forces. We are not homophobic, but we want to ensure that everybody in the army has the same sexual orientation. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Military stance on homosexuality.
Old value:: Homosexuality is allowed in the military.
Current: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Proposed: Homosexuality is not tolerated in the military. The military actively seeks to remove homosexuals from it.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change International trade (this is a default in the absense of a specific free trade agreement or specific trade embargo)
Old value:: The nation allows for imports, but imposes protectionist tariffs and quotas on all imports.
Current: The nation imposes reciprocal tariffs on imports, with no tariffs imposed on states which impose no tariffs on our exports.
Proposed: The nation does not allow importation of any goods from any foreign nation.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government policy regarding housing.
Old value:: All housing is privately-owned.
Current: All housing is privately-owned.
Proposed: The state owns and maintains all housing.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:22:25, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Dolgar Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Nationalization Bill |
| Message | No. |
| Date | 06:12:39, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Supreme Soviet Party | To | Debating the Nationalization Bill |
| Message | #2 is reasonable, #1 is not. |
| Date | 11:04:14, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Dolgaria | To | Debating the Nationalization Bill |
| Message | As a member of ILGRA I can only promise to abstain myself. |
| Date | 11:04:38, September 18, 2005 CET | From | Communist Party of Dolgaria | To | Debating the Nationalization Bill |
| Message | Yet we are thankful of your goodwill |
| Date | 15:39:37, September 18, 2005 CET | From | CIVIL UNION | To | Debating the Nationalization Bill |
| Message | We have added yet another article, so with 2/3 of the Bill favouring rather leftist views, it might be possible to pass it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 40 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 159 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 100 |
| Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
| Random quote: "You can't get rid of poverty by giving people money." - P. J. O'Rourke |