We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Priority in fisheries
Details
Submitted by[?]: Cooperative Commonwealth Federation
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2114
Description[?]:
Where fish stocks are becoming depleted, the government may impose restrictions as a conservationist measure, to ensure the survival of fish stocks. In these cases, Indigenous peoples will be granted first claim on fishing, in order to permit the survival of their traditions. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Commercial fishing regulation.
Old value:: There are no limits on the amount of fish that may be caught.
Current: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Proposed: The government establishes fishing quotas.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 05:02:08, September 18, 2005 CET | From | CNT/AFL | To | Debating the Priority in fisheries |
Message | Supported. |
Date | 03:05:13, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Royal Conservative Party | To | Debating the Priority in fisheries |
Message | I would have supported this motion but alas the discriminatory phrase "In these cases, Indigenous peoples will be granted first claim on fishing, in order to permit the survival of their traditions" prevents me from doing so. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 115 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 185 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
Random quote: "Congress is like diapers; it should be changed regularly as it gets full of the same thing." - Seen on a bumper sticker |