Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 03:05:21
Server time: 00:54:38, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Moderate Privatisation Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Radical Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2569

Description[?]:

This Bill seeks a compromise, to meet de-regulation targets while accomodating for those which would be disenfranchised from laissez-faire economics.

Fieren Goldmark
Finance Minister

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:59:22, April 30, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Capitalist Delegation
ToDebating the Moderate Privatisation Bill
MessageWe support Article I regarding gambling, and half heartedly support Article II regarding Library funding. Although we would rather have the funding come from the federal government for libraries, we veiw the proposed value as more beneficial than the current value.

We simply can't support Article III regarding health care, as it is one of the few industries we feel strongly about having some sort of nationalization to. We cannot support the abolishment of public health care, as we believe that ensuring the health of our population is essential to keeping the free market working at maximum efficiency.

We have concerns with Article IV regarding postal service. Although we are not against an alteration to the current policy, we believe that a 100% privitization of postal service would unecessarily drive up costs. This is bad for our citizens, and quite frankly it's bad for business as well.

Article V regarding energy generation is acceptable to us, although we would prefer the co-existence of public and private power generation. Article VI regarding the energy grid however, is not acceptable. The national power grid is far too essential to our country to be put in the hands of private business owners. We prefer the policy as it stands, and at most, would only support handing it over to local governments.

Overall, our issues with this bill will force us to vote no.

James Lott
Chairman
Democratic Capitalist Delegation

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 194

no
    

Total Seats: 266

abstain
  

Total Seats: 41


Random fact: The forum contains a lot of useful information, it has updates to the game, role playing between nations, news and discussion. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 67