We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Military Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Traditional Conservative's Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2571
Description[?]:
| We need a stronger military. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change National service.
Old value:: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve either a term in the military or a lesser paid term of civilian national service, at their option.
Current: All adults upon completion of schooling can be required in times of war to serve a term in the military.
Proposed: All adults upon completion of schooling must serve a term in the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:20:24, May 02, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Alliance Party | To | Debating the Military Act |
| Message | After the recent terrorist attack in the Hilgar Crownland, I stress that all parties vote in approval of this bill. |
| Date | 21:17:13, May 03, 2008 CET | From | Progressive Liberal Party of Hulstria | To | Debating the Military Act |
| Message | Ridiculous, spending our money on to much military, making our country a fascist state, these are not the answer to terrorist treats, this is wasting money we should invest in our economy. Let us reconsider this act, recognizing the treats we face and acting to that. The terrorist do not fight with conventional weapons, playing military as we would love them to play, so why do we act this way. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 308 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 192 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: In cases where a party has no seat, the default presumption should be that the party is able to contribute to debates in the legislature due to one of its members winning a seat at a by-election. However, players may collectively improvise arrangements of their own to provide a satisfying explanation for how parties with no seats in the legislature can speak and vote there. |
| Random quote: "Since when did you care about women?" - Faith Chiang, former Gaduri politician |