Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:35:53
Server time: 18:24:06, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Better National Assembly Math Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Populist Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2114

Description[?]:

Whereas, Paliamentary votes can easily end in ties as is, making an odd number of seats optimal and

Whereas, all calculations are easier if a majority is gained by a round number,

We hereby propose that the size of Paliament shall become 599 seats, meaning 300 seats for a majority and 400 seats for a contitutional supermajority.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date02:55:59, September 19, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageI'm open to this idea, but what I really wanted to say is that I'm going to be using the term "supermajority" until the day I die.

Date14:38:18, September 19, 2005 CET
FromSecular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageBut why increasing it so much?
Couldn't we set the number to 399 ?

Date20:10:44, September 19, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageWe're willing to make it 399 if that's preferred.

Date00:22:29, September 20, 2005 CET
FromSecular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageI will suport this.

Date01:05:15, September 20, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageJust 399? I would have preferred 499.

Date01:09:02, September 20, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageThe thing with 499 is that 250 isn't as round as 200 or 300. :)

We first wanted to make it 599 and still feel that's the best, but we see 399 as an acceptable alternative. If the KPP prefers 599, we'll wait for other preferences, but will be willing to change it back to 599 before the vote if that has the most support.

Date02:11:25, September 20, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran People's Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageI do know that DCP prefers more seats over less, but am not sure about NPP. I guess we'll have to wait for them to opine.

Date19:42:54, September 20, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageThe NPP prefers 599, so that's what seems to have majority approval. We hope the SHP won't vote against it just because they think there are too many. It makes for better math this way.

Date21:26:10, September 20, 2005 CET
FromSecular Humanist Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageI agree that an odd number will be better, but I tried many times to lower this number...

Date21:56:45, September 20, 2005 CET
FromNationalist Freedom Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageI am agree with this proposal. How typical is it of SHP to vote against it while his seats are plentiful.

Date22:13:28, September 20, 2005 CET
FromPopulist Liberal Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageThe NPP has indicated a preference for 599, and we believe the KPP supports the odd number of seats either way, so if they vote as we expect they will, this will pass.

Date01:59:13, September 21, 2005 CET
FromKanjoran Imperial Party
ToDebating the Better National Assembly Math Act
MessageYes, this is a great idea

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
       

Total Seats: 326

no
 

Total Seats: 114

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: It is possible for a player to transfer ownership of a character or a royal house to another player. This should be done in a public way, such as on the Character Transfers thread, so that if a dispute arises in the future, Moderation can be pointed towards evidence of the transfer.

    Random quote: "Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it." - George Bernard Shaw

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 70