We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Environmental Protection Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revolucia Partio de Koburo
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2573
Description[?]:
"It is sheer lunacy to allow local governments to decide environmental policies. Sure, the Irkawans might do a good job protecting the forests and the parks, but what about those slack-jawed yokels in Domale? I don't think they can be trusted to take care of things like this. Oh and what about the Egatonese? They'll unregulate everything and sell it off to the private sector! Lunacy!" - Furrio Mazzi, Environmental Spokesman |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Forest management.
Old value:: Local governments are required to operate forestry agencies, which own and manage all forest land.
Current: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Proposed: There is a national agency which owns and manages all forest land.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change Regulation of the quality of drinking water.
Old value:: The government sets a range of standards dependant on water usage. (grey water regulation, etc.)
Current: Local government is responsible for drinking water quality regulation.
Proposed: The government sets a single standard to ensure all tap water is drinkable.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 02:47:14, May 07, 2008 CET | From | Democratic Labour Party of Cobura | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | Domale has been running services perfectly fine under the DLP-lead administration there, and there is no policies towards enviromental destruction. |
Date | 04:07:27, May 07, 2008 CET | From | Revolucia Partio de Koburo | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | Whatever, you damn pig-fucking hick. Fuggetabouit. |
Date | 04:07:59, May 07, 2008 CET | From | Revolucia Partio de Koburo | To | Debating the Environmental Protection Act |
Message | Um...that was Furrio again....sorry. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 101 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 375 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 74 |
Random fact: Don't vote yes on a cabinet coalition that doesn't give you the power that you deserve. |
Random quote: "Before all else, be armed." - Niccolo Machiavelli |