Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5477
Next month in: 02:42:01
Server time: 01:17:58, May 01, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Parliament Act, 2574

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Liberal Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2576

Description[?]:

After the debate (and rejection) of the 2573 proposal for a Parliament Act, a renewed, more thought-out version comes back.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:01:04, May 11, 2008 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageThe last Parliament Act was rejected on the grounds that it would make elections always fall at "bad times" for the same people. However, the current Senate term length is exactly 6 days of realtime, which means that elections _already_ fall at bad times for the same people - nominally me: the election was at 4-8 AM again. Thus, this proposal enlarges the Senate term to about 6 days and sixteen hour, making elections roll around the clock.

We could also support a shortening of the Senate term if other parties want so, our objective is avoiding elections always falling at the same hour of the day.

Date15:52:37, May 11, 2008 CET
FromJustice League of Cildania
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageAgreed, that's fine... although we noticed you were online during the last elections...

Date16:00:47, May 11, 2008 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageYep, I was studying for a test this Monday, I'm not usually up that late.

What do other parties have to say? This proposal is a constitutional amendment, requiring 2/3 of the Senate, or 117 votes, to pass. Thus, we need support from everyone.

Date21:19:33, May 11, 2008 CET
FromDemocratic Socialist Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageI'll need to work this out, and right now it's too late for me to do that. I'm in Beijing, GMT +8, which kinda messes me around a lot. That said, I'm happy to vote for a regularly-differing election time.

Date20:44:20, May 12, 2008 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageSince there seems to be no more active debate, the PL will move this bill to a vote.

Date03:58:21, May 13, 2008 CET
FromProgressive Liberal Party
ToDebating the Parliament Act, 2574
MessageOnce again, the PLP would like to encourage every party to vote on this proposal, no matter what the vote is. If you even marginally agree with this proposal, please vote "yes" on it, because it _needs_ 117 votes to pass.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 139

no

    Total Seats: 0

    abstain
       

    Total Seats: 36


    Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

    Random quote: "Judge me all you want, just keep the verdict to yourself." - From a Winston advertisement

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54