We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change)
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2577
Description[?]:
We feel that the current term needs to be shortened back to three years. The current four year cycle has been nothing but negative for the political life of Sekowo. Politicians, like diapers need to be checked frequently and changed when needed. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The length of a legislative and executive term, in months. Should be between 24 and 72.
Old value:: 48
Current: 60
Proposed: 36
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 20:15:53, May 14, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | What negative effect has it had for Sekowo? |
Date | 02:22:11, May 15, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | OOC: It screws up our visibility on isues since there tends to be a ful game year and a half that no bills are being passed. |
Date | 02:26:42, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Sekowan Liberation Front | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | We support. |
Date | 02:39:59, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | Eh, perhaps its time to shorten it. Three is good, not two though incause you trhought about pushing it |
Date | 06:12:18, May 15, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | No, three is the amount I support, two would be to fast for RP reasons as well. |
Date | 18:16:01, May 15, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | If there are no bills in play, it wouldn't matter whether the time frame is three years or four years, there still aren't any bills. |
Date | 02:20:10, May 16, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | It would reduce the amount of time that between bills passing, therebe reducing the amoutn fo time our positions are not being updated. |
Date | 04:25:09, May 16, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | Actually, it would increase the amount of time for many bills to pass, as elections would interrupt the voting procedure more frequently. |
Date | 04:38:17, May 16, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | How many of us actually put bills up to vote up when we know they won't pass before the election though? |
Date | 17:45:56, May 16, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | That would be me, unfortunately. |
Date | 03:46:23, May 17, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Gov.0002.2575 (Term Change) |
Message | Ah, well, we've all been known to do it though. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 253 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 251 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 96 |
Random fact: Moderation will not accept Cultural Protocol updates which introduce, on a significant scale, cultures which are likely to be insufficiently accessible to players. In particular, for all significant cultures in Particracy, it should be easy for players to access and use online resources to assist with language translation and the generation of character names. Moderation reserves the right to amend Cultural Protocols which are deemed to have introduced significant cultures that are not sufficiently accessible and which are not being actively role-played with. |
Random quote: "If voting changed anything, they'd abolish it." - Ken Livingstone |