Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 00:51:00
Server time: 23:08:59, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): ADM Drax | Klexi | luthorian3059 | TaMan443 | VojmatDun | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Withdraw from the Axis Treaty

Details

Submitted by[?]: Soviet Party (Trotskyist)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes the withdrawal from a treaty. It will require half of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: August 2578

Description[?]:

We propose to withdraw from the Axis of Evil Agreement.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:59:35, May 17, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe NMP was not aware we belonged to an "Axis Of Evil".

Date23:27:39, May 17, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageWe do. It's called the AAT.

Date23:35:57, May 17, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe "Axis Alliance Of Terra" is hardly evil, and all of Malivia's recognized parties support their efforts.

Date23:44:03, May 17, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe MDP voted against the AAT treaty. They are a recognized party.
We proposed this bill. We are a recognized party.
What definition of "all" are you using?

Date23:46:24, May 17, 2008 CET
FromSoviet Party (Trotskyist)
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageAnd why is it that the NMP says they are for national sovereignty, yet protests when we propose that Malivia leaves sovereignty-breaching organization of aggressors called the AAT? You're either for national sovereignty or against national sovereignty.

Date23:52:58, May 17, 2008 CET
FromUnited Malivia
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe AAT has become defunct from what we believed was its true nature as an anti-communist organization. It has instead proposed to fight against fascist governments, which is reason enough that we should withdraw from this treaty.

Date00:04:40, May 18, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe AAT is was created to protect it's member's nation sovereignty. Through that we defend Malivia's sovereignty.
We encourage the UM to rethink their position. By supporting the AAT we are also supporting the creation of government friendly to Malivia. All actions that are taken by the AAT do not have to be supported by its members and we have the option to simply not partake in any pro-leftist acts.

Date00:06:53, May 18, 2008 CET
FromUnited Malivia
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageUnited Malivia has reconsidered its position, yet come to the same conclusion as before. For the same reasons that we withdrew our membership from the AAT so should we withdraw Malivia from the Axis Agreement.

Date04:43:38, May 18, 2008 CET
FromSupporters of Science in Design (IP)
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe Axis allows for a stronger international Malivian presence. We would be shirking our duty to the nation's pride if we shyed from our commitment.

Date06:14:54, May 18, 2008 CET
From Lutherans of Keymon
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageAnti-fascist? How so? We are not anti-fascist. We have decided to ditch our neutrality and have gone to war with the Communists allies in Hutori. How then are we anti-fascist?

Date13:07:49, May 18, 2008 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageActually as somewhat fascist party we see no anti-fascism in AAT.

You withdrawing from the Axis Agreement is not for the good of our two nations neither. It is a defence pact and in no way forces you to take part in hostile offensives if a nation doesn't want to. Currently the Axis Agreement benefits both, Darnussia and Malivia as it gives us insurance to have help from eachother in cases of foreign hostilities. Withdrawing from it is working straight to the hands of your and our enemies.

- Anton Robervou, President of Darnussia

Date18:50:09, May 18, 2008 CET
From Hobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe Hobrazian People Party welcome this move and look forward to establish a local artanian defence pact instead.

Date22:13:22, May 18, 2008 CET
FromLoyalistische Partei
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageYou should be affraid of Hobrazian pacts, you never know when they are trying to tie you up in their "Unions" with them, taking away your independence. They have done it before.

Date00:56:41, May 19, 2008 CET
From Hobrazian Peoples Party
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe malivians voluntarily joined the Malivian - Hobrazian Union. We did not force anyone.

Date03:48:39, May 19, 2008 CET
FromNational Anti-Communist Front
ToDebating the Withdraw from the Axis Treaty
MessageThe NMP supports our alliance with Darnussia, through the AAT. Recently Hobrazia's ally has taken hostile actions against Malivia with the sinking of the Wishibar.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 340

no
  

Total Seats: 105

abstain
 

Total Seats: 55


Random fact: There is a phpBB forum dedicated to Particracy. Please click the Forum link in the top game menu. Additions to the game, suggestions and discussion is held there so get involved. http://forum.particracy.net/

Random quote: "The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government." - Ayn Rand

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81