We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear power reform act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Theofascist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2114
Description[?]:
| There is no need to encourage nuclear power. I will not propose abolishing it, but a technology that may have disastrous consequences should not be unduly encouraged. Energy companies may operate nuclear power plants if they wish; but we should not spend tax dinars on making them. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on nuclear power.
Old value:: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Current: The government encourages nuclear power (subsidies, tax relief etc).
Proposed: The government does not take any position on nuclear power.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:09:17, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Kirlawa Green Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | we will of course support this proposal. Green and renewable energy is the future. Don't forget uranium is also a limited resource... |
| Date | 18:12:51, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | Oppose them both. |
| Date | 18:36:55, September 20, 2005 CET | From |  Theofascist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | Why, though? |
| Date | 18:51:35, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Theofascist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | I'm willing to remove the second article if it makes it more acceptable. But the first article stays as I think that tax relief/subsidies on nuclear power is a waste of money. |
| Date | 19:57:44, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Kirlawa Freedom Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | First article.. Okay. Second, well I was the one who abolished it, so you understand that I cannot support that |
| Date | 20:04:18, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | 1. yes 2. no |
| Date | 01:25:48, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | I prefer Nuclear power to stupid windfarms. I'll support the Government takes no position whatsoever on energy. |
| Date | 09:25:42, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Democratic Socialist Workers Party | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | We prefer renewable energy, but nuclear power is also an acceptable alternative over fossil fuels. Government support will ensure that we can more easily keep it safe. |
| Date | 18:56:37, September 21, 2005 CET | From | Red Star Movement | To | Debating the Nuclear power reform act |
| Message | I can't decide over nuclear power. It has many potentially beneficial implications (no discharges in to the air) and can mass produce more efficiently than fossil fuels. But of course, the radioactive waste is obviously extremely harmful. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 224 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 77 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
| Random quote: "This country has far more problems than it deserves and far more solutions than it applies." - Ralph Nader |