We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CPL Police Back Up Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Liberal Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2115
Description[?]:
| As current legislation allows the Police Forces to go on strike, we feel that the Military must be given extra powers with which to operate when the police are on strike. We make it perfectly clear that the Military are only to be given these powers when the police are on strike. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's policy on the separation of the police and the military.
Old value:: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Current: A civilian police force is in place and the military may be called in to help in serious emergencies.
Proposed: A civilian police force is in place, backed up by the military.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:05:58, September 20, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the CPL Police Back Up Bill |
| Message | The AAP opposes. |
| Date | 17:57:04, September 22, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the CPL Police Back Up Bill |
| Message | this has been up for debate for a year now (two days), as there have been no further comments, we shall proced to vote. |
| Date | 23:54:30, September 22, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the CPL Police Back Up Bill |
| Message | I seem to have missed a whole string of bills in the debate phase. It is so confusing when they all go CPLsomethingorrather. Anyway, we oppose this level of military involvement in the police force. I thought you were trying to introduce military grade weapons for police so the military WOULDNT HAVE TO interfere? because introducing both at once seems rather like trying to introduce a police state, to me. |
| Date | 11:00:30, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Liberal Party | To | Debating the CPL Police Back Up Bill |
| Message | : ) |
| Date | 18:55:22, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Party for Equality | To | Debating the CPL Police Back Up Bill |
| Message | does that smug smile mean you ARE trying to introduce a police state? I don't know what this country is coming to. mutter mutter. :-) (I have a nose. I am SO superior) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 110 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 69 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 96 |
| Random fact: If you want to know how many players there are in Particracy right now, check out the Game Statistics buried at the bottom of the World Map screen. |
| Random quote: "Isn't it about time that the US government stop supporting dictatorships and avaricious oligarchies with our tax monies, munitions, and diplomacy?" - Ralph Nader |