We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reform Act III
Details
Submitted by[?]: Federal Republican Party (UCF)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2582
Description[?]:
| We believe that, unless their is cruel or painful treatment of an animal, cosmetic designers have a right to test unharmful products on certain animals. We also believe that simplifying the procedure of doing medical research on animals, can greatly benefit the general public of Mordusia. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The use of animals in medical research.
Old value:: Animal research projects must apply for a license and submit to regulation.
Current: There are no restrictions on the use of animals for research.
Proposed: The use of animals in research is subject to basic regulations.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:37:36, May 23, 2008 CET | From | Mordusian Austrian Union | To | Debating the Reform Act III |
| Message | We support this bill. |
| Date | 16:02:57, May 24, 2008 CET | From | Constitution Party | To | Debating the Reform Act III |
| Message | CP opposes this bill. |
| Date | 08:56:33, May 25, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Reform Act III |
| Message | We would like to know the nature of the CP's opposition and if they would agree to compromise? |
| Date | 03:48:45, May 26, 2008 CET | From | Constitution Party | To | Debating the Reform Act III |
| Message | CP believes that industry does not need to use animals for cosmetic research. Some animal makes sacrifices so humans can look better? We can accept the medical research article as it at least has the possibility to benefit humans. |
| Date | 15:26:14, May 26, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Reform Act III |
| Message | We agree to compromise. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 132 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 34 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 34 |
| Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play". |
| Random quote: "It is said, 'Pontesi is Jelbic in nature'. But I tell you, they are really a lost tribe of Selucians, forced to become barbarians by their savage Jelbic conquerors." - Alamar Xarfaxis, former Pontesian politician |