We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote
Details
Submitted by[?]: Imperial Pluralism Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2629
Description[?]:
| We propose that the judges cast their votes on Sekowo v. Kayabuki. The judges in this trial are: Tiberius Phaneris (AUP) Wace d Jrri (NPP) Steve Cream (IMF) Daqmara Khazbiika (AFFS) Dr. Oskar Peter Baumgartner (CP) Lyev Chernomazov (AFFS) Ray Redson (IMF) Dr. Felix Hubert Schmidt (CP) Geraint Jennings (NPP) Hank Peters (AUP) Sheila Martin (AUP) Flavio Sandoval (AFFS) Theodore Anderson (AUP) The acquittal or conviction as well as the sentence are decided by a plurality of ministers. Each party indicated above should present the votes of its ministers: |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:29:06, May 25, 2008 CET | From |  Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | Tiberius Phaneris: "guilty" Hank Peters: "guilty" Sheila Martin: "guilty" Theodore Anderson: "guilty" |
| Date | 03:48:08, May 25, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | Steve Cream: "Guilty" Ray Redson: "Guilty" OOC: So I assume the next bill will be voting on what the punishment will be? |
| Date | 05:13:46, May 25, 2008 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | OOC: good idea. It would be nice if a party other than us could make that bill in order to widen the legal tradition. |
| Date | 11:35:50, May 25, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | Wace d Jrri: "Vici" (Guilty) Geraint Jennings: "Vici" (Guilty) |
| Date | 16:30:11, May 25, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | Daqmara Khazbiika: "Guilty." Flavio Sandoval: "Guilty." Lyev Chernomazov: "Guilty." OOC: Ministry of Justice, perhaps? |
| Date | 16:59:41, May 27, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | OOC: So we're just waiting on CP then? I'd really like to put this to rest, since we have other things to deal with now. |
| Date | 03:54:52, May 28, 2008 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | OOC: a plurality was all that was needed anyways, so the verdict can be proclaimed. Even though this verdict comes from the previous cabinet, a plurality was reached previous to the cabinet change. We suppose that, lacking any other guidelines, the current cabinet will decide the sentence: IC: A plurality of ministers has found Kayabuki guilty of violating Sekowan administrative law. Let sentencing begin. |
| Date | 21:38:21, May 29, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | OOC: I don't think that anyone else is going to finish this, so AUP, will you please make the bill for the punishment part so we can get this over with. |
| Date | 15:55:40, August 28, 2008 CET | From | Imperial Pluralism Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | ARCHIVING please abstain |
| Date | 23:43:59, August 28, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | Why abstain? |
| Date | 19:42:33, August 29, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Sekowo vs. Kayabuki Administrative Trial (2580) Vote |
| Message | So we can see what happens if no one votes either way? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||||
| yes | Total Seats: 90 | ||||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 484 |
| Random fact: Particracy is set in the fictional world of Terra, which mirrors the real world of today and yet is not quite like it. |
| Random quote: "Civil disobedience. . . is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that numbers of people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of the leaders of their government and have gone to war, and millions have been killed because of this obedience. . Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and war, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, and all the while the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem." - Howard Zinn |