We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Information Access Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Revival Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2115
Description[?]:
We feel the current privacy law situation is dangerous and stands as a loophole for those seeking to hide criminal information and civil case information. Therefore we propose: (1) To implement Habeas Data; that the justice can force individuals to provide information where needed. |
Proposals
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:00:04, September 22, 2005 CET | From | EcoSocialist Party | To | Debating the Information Access Bill |
Message | it would be better if you actually put proposals on your bills |
Date | 22:24:55, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Revival Party | To | Debating the Information Access Bill |
Message | That is a proposal...we propose that habeas data is allowed to take place, a change from the current law... |
Date | 22:41:48, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Revival Party | To | Debating the Information Access Bill |
Message | OOC: Forget last message, idiocy hit. :) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | ||||||
no |
Total Seats: 251 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
Random quote: "Politics is perhaps the only profession for which no preparation is thought necessary." - Robert Louis Stevenson |