We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Return to a Civil Society
Details
Submitted by[?]: The Centre Gentlemen's Society
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2584
Description[?]:
It is The Society's notion that people should be able to choose the course of their life as they see fit. The community should regulate what it feels is proper. If the lifestyle a person chooses is not promoted in there community, they should be able to move as they wish to a community that does agree with them. The role of regulation of the community should be left up to the community just as matters of state should stay with the state. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards alcoholic beverages.
Old value:: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased only from licensed sales outlets, and can only be available to adults.
Current: Alcoholic beverage regulations are not imposed by the government.
Proposed: Alcoholic beverages may be purchased and consumed anywhere, but only by adults.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is only allowed in private homes and clubs.
Current: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner. However, service/employer property owners that allow smoking must provide a separate non-smoking section.
Proposed: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, and is legal in government-owned buildings.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The government's stance on vaccinations.
Old value:: The government mandates vaccination for all children.
Current: The government encourages vaccinations for children, but does not enforce them.
Proposed: The government mandates vaccination for all children, but parents may opt out for religious or ideological reasons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 03:30:12, May 29, 2008 CET | From | The Centre Gentlemen's Society | To | Debating the Return to a Civil Society |
Message | Since we hit an election and this bill was tabled, we were curious of what people found so revolting within this bill. Is it because it allows the individual and community more control over itself? Or is it that it limits government oversight? Please educate us. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 200 | |||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 100 |
Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair |