We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives
Details
Submitted by[?]: Anarchist Party of Lodamun
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2584
Description[?]:
Contraceptives should be easily accessed by the general population. This will reduce the ammount of abortions and poverty (people having children they cannot afford) |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on subsidising contraception.
Old value:: The government does not supply free or discounted contraceptives.
Current: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Proposed: The government offers free contraceptives in pharmacies and public toilets.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:43:33, May 29, 2008 CET | From | The Liberal Party | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | We have always trie to get this passed and as so we fully support. |
Date | 05:13:14, May 30, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | Does the APL know what Anarchy is? I see the opposite of Anarchy in all its proposals - just more government spending. |
Date | 06:12:56, May 30, 2008 CET | From | The Meso Party | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | We also support this bill in principle. However, we feel that government contraceptives should not be assessable in public toilets. Limit dispensing them to pharmacies only were a pharmacist is available to answer questions on product use and risk. Then it will have our full support. This will also reduce the programs overall cost. |
Date | 17:00:06, May 30, 2008 CET | From | Anarchist Party of Lodamun | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | URRA: yes, I know what Anarchy is. And it's a progressive ideal, not one you can implant overnight. What's the problem with handling out contraceptives? Isn't that good for the people? Meso: I don't think there's that option. |
Date | 21:27:26, May 30, 2008 CET | From | United Republics Party | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | Anarchy and subsidies for contraceptives are not based in the same ideology. Anarchists don't want government subsidies period. Anarchy is not progressive - it's anarchists and I suggest you change the name of your party to something that makes sense or at least look into what anarchy really is. |
Date | 03:04:57, June 02, 2008 CET | From | Pariah Idealism | To | Debating the Bill for the subsidising of contraceptives |
Message | Leave the party alone URRA, they've barely started showing us what they're about. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 37 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 58 | ||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 55 |
Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453 |
Random quote: "If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared." - Niccolo Machiavelli |