We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Courts
Details
Submitted by[?]: The New Republican Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2584
Description[?]:
| , |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:44:51, May 30, 2008 CET | From |  Party for Individualism and Kitties | To | Debating the Courts |
| Message | any reason? |
| Date | 00:22:34, May 31, 2008 CET | From | The New Republican Party | To | Debating the Courts |
| Message | The Proposal says most of the Reason.. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 324 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 97 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 129 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow role-play that seems to belong to the world of fantasy, science fiction and futuristic speculation. |
| Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |