We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom Again Act.
Details
Submitted by[?]: Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2027
Description[?]:
| People have the right to chose whom they love. Debate will not solve this therefore it is thrown into a vote. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy toward marriage.
Old value:: Civil marriages are defined by local governments.
Current: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Proposed: The government allows all consenting adults to obtain civil marriage contracts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | not recorded | From | Senatus et Populusque Kirlawan(SPQK) | To | Debating the Freedom Again Act. |
| Message | Debate will not solve this therefore it is thrown into a vote. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Conservative Christian Royalists | To | Debating the Freedom Again Act. |
| Message | history and religion cannot be thrown away so that you lot can seek votes from the minority. while you lot are burning the bible why not burn all common decncy and sense of respect for humankind. this bill is ridiculous. well done for seeing sense united democratic bloc! |
| Date | not recorded | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Freedom Again Act. |
| Message | You know what the problem is with the majority defining morality and regulating freedoms that do not directly harm other citizens? Is when you find yourself no longer in the majority and your beliefs and freedoms become subject to regulation. As long as the majority can define what freedoms are and what freedoms are not permissible, every citizen’s personal views and freedoms are at risk, should their views not be of the majority. Thus by demanding the de-regulation of all freedoms, even of the ones I strongly feel to be wrong and immoral; I am actually protecting my own beliefs, values and worldview from being regulated by the majority (hopefully). If it doesn’t physically harm another citizen it should be legal – no matter what it is. |
| Date | not recorded | From | Federalist Labour Party | To | Debating the Freedom Again Act. |
| Message | Oh and I'm a Christian also - hence I'm not burning the bible or burning common decency. I am merely defending the beliefs and freedoms of all our citizens, thus protecting my own. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 399 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If there are no parties in your nation with seats, feel free to visit the forum and request an early election on the Early Election Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4362 |
| Random quote: "He comes out of hibernation once every three years and says something stupid. No wonder the UR fell apart." - Tirza Sommer, Pragmatic Party Leader, on the Dorvish President, Leonhard Khan. |