Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:42:33
Server time: 07:17:26, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): blowingnorthwind | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the The Axis Agreement

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2586

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the The Axis Agreement. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:39:38, June 02, 2008 CET
FromFree Leftist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
MessageOther than Article V, I'd be for this.

Date19:30:48, June 02, 2008 CET
FromAnarchist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
MessageHow is this Liberal? This is totally unethical.

Date19:49:10, June 02, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
MessageExplain the "unethical part."

I told you already that I am very conservative (much more than LLP and that is too much to say) on the issue of national security. But this treaty does not deal with Liberalism or Conservatism in any way.

Date20:09:14, June 02, 2008 CET
FromAnarchist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
MessageI find this a very aggressive and unnecessary treaty.

Date20:27:03, June 02, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
MessageYou can vote no like you did but I still don't understand the unethical part. This is a normal treaty being put up for ratificatio, it gets approved or disapproved. I am not stealing anyone's vote or forcing the treaty through.

Date14:30:11, June 03, 2008 CET
FromAnarchist Party of Lodamun
ToDebating the Ratification of the The Axis Agreement
Messageok, maybe unethical was the wrong choice of words :p

Still think it's unnecessary.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 57

no
    

Total Seats: 71

abstain
  

Total Seats: 22


Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion

Random quote: "The packaging for a microwavable 'microwave' dinner is programmed for a shelf life of maybe six months, a cook time of two minutes and a landfill dead-time of centuries." - David Wann

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 52