We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Aversion (UHT)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union of Higher Thinking
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2586
Description[?]:
| We must not allow nuclear weapons to return and endanger us all. Let us quash this legislation before it sets in. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 18:00:05, June 02, 2008 CET | From |  All-Indrala National League | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | at present 5 nations in the world do not have nuclear weapons. The UHT wants to disarm Indrala and leave it open to attacks from Tyrants. NO we say, Indrala must be independent and to be independent it must be strong! vote against removing our nuclear deterrent! |
| Date | 19:17:19, June 02, 2008 CET | From | United Justice Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | This is absurd and grossly irresponsible as we face the threat of war. |
| Date | 20:33:50, June 02, 2008 CET | From | Peoples Independence Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | The PIP will support this, however we would rather that research of these weapons still be carried out to ensure the latest protection measures in the event that they are used. |
| Date | 00:08:06, June 03, 2008 CET | From | Federalist Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | We got guns for our civilians, so I will vote yes. |
| Date | 18:27:41, June 03, 2008 CET | From | United Justice Party | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | PIP, FP you can't seriously be voting for this. We are under the threat of WAR. We NEED the nuclear deterrent. The fact that the gun legalisation passed is a pathetic, spineless reason to support this abominable bill. Grow a backbone and vote no. |
| Date | 18:41:30, June 03, 2008 CET | From | Union of Higher Thinking | To | Debating the Nuclear Aversion (UHT) |
| Message | There's no need to be rude, UJP. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 379 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 371 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "We have to face the fact that either all of us are going to die together or we are going to learn to live together, and if we are to live together we have to talk." - Eleanor Roosevelt |