Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 02:40:12
Server time: 21:19:47, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): Dx6743 | HopesFor | Klexi | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Repeal of Gun Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: First Socialist Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2141

Description[?]:

There is no reason why any citizen should have a gun short of professional reasons.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:00:02, September 22, 2005 CET
FromMilitant Labour Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageThe state should not have a monopoly on the possession of weapons. Otherwise how can it legitimately rule?

Date04:44:52, September 23, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageWith words and votes.

Date13:05:05, September 23, 2005 CET
FromUnited Military Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageAnd/ or the fact that the outlaw of guns is the beginning slope of the government decline into fascism.

Date14:20:27, September 23, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageWe don't believe the government should have guns either. That is why we back the police only having non-lethal weapons.

Date15:29:00, September 23, 2005 CET
FromUnited Military Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageSo we should let the military defend our country with rocks?

Date06:23:51, September 25, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageOf course not. I didn't say anything about the military. I only mentioned the police. We cannot get around the military, and perhaps certain other exceptions, having guns.

Date14:01:56, September 25, 2005 CET
FromUnited Military Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
Messagemilitary-government, government-military? Put to vote?

Date15:57:50, September 26, 2005 CET
From First Socialist Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageWill you back this?

Date21:56:46, September 26, 2005 CET
FromUnited Military Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageNot really, no.

Date16:06:32, November 05, 2005 CET
FromDemocratic-Republican Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageAgainst

Date21:31:37, November 08, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageWhat the citizens of the country do should be of no concern of government. It should not be the role of a responsible government to nanny its citizens nor should it be the role of government to restrict the freee enterprise of a section of its industry, namely in this case the arms industry.

The Libertarian Party supports the repeal of virtually all laws, however as this replaces one law with an even stricter alternative we cannot support this proposal.

Date03:46:37, November 14, 2005 CET
FromPeoples Revolutionary Party
ToDebating the Repeal of Gun Bill
MessageGuns in the hands of the people has been a question for years. The pro's and con's have both been good points. However the people choose to own firearms for safty purposes. If a criminal wants a gun he can get one wiether we want him to or not.

The police need guns to ensure the safty of there own lives and that of those they proctect.

As a government we are elected to ensure the freedom and safty of the people, not demoralize them by taking there god given rights away.

The People Liberation Party will have to vote no on this bill.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 127

no
     

Total Seats: 122

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law.

Random quote: "Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun... our principle is to have the Party control the gun and never allow the gun to control the Party." - Mao Zedong

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 78