We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Judicial Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2589
Description[?]:
| An act to abolish the crime of indecent exposure. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 15:55:45, June 08, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | Nudity never harmed anyone. The Courts should not be wasting their time on such an unnecessary crime. |
| Date | 18:07:26, June 08, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | Nudity is one thing, public nudity is another. Our citizens have the right not to be unwillingly confronted with naked people running around the street with their ding-dongs dangling about.. |
| Date | 01:09:53, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Human Extinction Project | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | Local communities should be able to decide upon their own norms on this issue. Professor Horace Werckle (Director of the Human Extinction Project) |
| Date | 03:10:14, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | Nobody has the right not to be offended. |
| Date | 18:16:22, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Greenish Liberal Democratic Socialists | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | Who said anything about "offended". I said people have the right not to be confronted with nudity. If they want to dangle their dingdonges, they can still chose to go to a nudity camp.. People going there are fully aware they will be confronted with naked people. |
| Date | 22:11:14, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Judicial Union Party | To | Debating the Crimes (Indecent Exposure) Abolition Act |
| Message | So, you're saying people have the right not to see a nude person? That seems quite a petty right, and a person's right to wear what they like (or nothing at all) is superior to that. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 146 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 354 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
| Random quote: "In any country there must be people who have to die. They are the sacrifices any nation has to make to achieve law and order." - Idi Amin |