We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Bestiality Regulation (2589)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Normand Pluralist Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2590
Description[?]:
| The most fair way to deal with Bestiality is to allow it to be permitted in the areas where it is locally acceptable, and to allow communities where it is highly offensive to ban it; if the government fails to act in the interests of local communities, they may take the law into their own hands, creating the potential for vigilante-style violence which could have been avoided with proper local governance. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding bestiality (performing sexual acts with animals).
Old value:: The government has no policy concerning bestiality.
Current: The legality of bestiality is decided upon by local governments.
Proposed: The legality of bestiality is decided upon by local governments.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:51:38, June 09, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | No. We consider the idea of allowing governments to ban freedom to be despicable, and therefore are voting against. |
| Date | 08:57:56, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | Freedom to rape animals? |
| Date | 09:04:11, June 09, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | We do not consider rape to be an appropriate term, as it is more legalistic and is only truly useable in events that there is any level of sentience. |
| Date | 15:39:34, June 09, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | So what the DSP is saying, is that it is only rape in the case of whales. Any other animal is quite alright, because they don't need to be treated humanely or any other such idea. |
| Date | 02:50:01, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | We find the DSP's disregard for both animal life and human sensibilities appalling. |
| Date | 08:07:59, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | A step in the proper direction. |
| Date | 21:07:45, June 10, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | What we're saying is that the word rape is inappropriate for the matter as it tends to be legalistic, another word would be more useful. Also, for future note, Whales, Dolphins, great apes and Humans make up the top most level of Sentience per law, so in the cases of those animals the word rape would be appropriate. OOC: Not saying that rape is right, but lots of animals practice what we would call rape, so I have to ask if it can really be considered forced if that's how the species acts normally. |
| Date | 22:06:48, June 10, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | [[Humans are just a tiny bit more morally advanced than animals, now aren't we?]] |
| Date | 01:36:53, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the Bestiality Regulation (2589) |
| Message | ((Apparently...)) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 275 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 252 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 73 |
| Random fact: Selucia is Particracy's modern take on Ancient Rome, located on the continent of Majatra. |
| Random quote: "I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing, and as necessary in the political world as storms in the physical." - Thomas Jefferson |