Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:10:40
Server time: 20:49:19, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): chrismcsherbert | JourneyKan | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Media Regulation Act of 2589

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2589

Description[?]:

This bill will:

1) Prohibit hate speech in the media.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date21:49:39, June 09, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Media Regulation Act of 2589
Messagefreedom of speech

Date22:05:53, June 09, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Media Regulation Act of 2589
MessageThose who speak about hatred do not deserve freedom of speech.

Date22:45:51, June 09, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Media Regulation Act of 2589
MessageWell it seems you are showing hatred towards people who speak what you take as hate speech, so then you shouldnt have freedom of speech then :P

But seriously, hate speech is to vague and the definition from person to person is affected political views. Freedom of speech is used to protect the unpopular speech, we have never needed freedom of speech to protect popular speech

Date01:06:29, June 10, 2008 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Media Regulation Act of 2589
MessageHatred is hatred, and everyone should know when they are saying it. Hate speech is racism, sexism, etc.

Date12:12:54, June 10, 2008 CET
FromLodamun Libertarian Party
ToDebating the Media Regulation Act of 2589
Messageboth sexism and racism has had changing definitions through the years based on the society. Therfore its to vague. But its clear you dont support freedom of speec, just speech you want to hear

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 21

no
    

Total Seats: 80

abstain
  

Total Seats: 20


Random fact: You can inactivate yourself on your User Page. You will then lose all your seats but your party account won't be deleted, and your party's Visibility ratings will not diminish. Reactivation can be requested in the "Reactivation Requests" thread in the Game Moderation section of the Particracy Forum.

Random quote: "There is a mandate to impose a voluntary return to traditional values." - Ronald Reagan

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 51