We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: test
Details
Submitted by[?]: Tory Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2591
Description[?]:
| To reintroduce the death penalty for Terrorists and crimes against humanity |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy with respect to the death penalty.
Old value:: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Current: The death penalty is illegal and is never to be applied.
Proposed: The death penalty is not applied, except for terrorism, treason and crimes against mankind.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:14:01, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Les Gardiens Rouge | To | Debating the test |
| Message | Execution IS terrorism, treason and a crime against mankind. NO. |
| Date | 16:22:44, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Parti de Garde Royales | To | Debating the test |
| Message | Absolutely. We must show we mean business. A great deterrent for crime. |
| Date | 21:58:14, June 11, 2008 CET | From | Les Gardiens Rouge | To | Debating the test |
| Message | And what if the person turns out inonnocent? You cant go into their bleeding grave, apologise and live life as if nothing happened. Because you killed him. I find in disguisting that you could use great to describe killing. Its murder, murder by the state. It is primitive and uncivilized. Anyone who votes in favour of this bill is commiting a crime against mankind, i will happily declare that now! Punishment should be based around reform, and you cannot reform a dead man. The fact that you are meddling with peoples lives is horrible. YOU ARE THE CRIMINALS. ANYONE WHO ADVOCATES DEATH TO ANYONE IS COMMITING THE SAME CRIME AS THE MURDERER. As mohandas ghandi once said, an eye for an eye, and the world becomes blind. i see that you yourself obviously are. Thank You, |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 131 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 140 | |||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 28 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "Man is by nature a political animal." - Aristotle |