Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: April 5475
Next month in: 00:33:25
Server time: 07:26:34, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): blowingnorthwind | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Tsarism

Details

Submitted by[?]: TSDRP

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2590

Description[?]:

Entrenching Aristocracy

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:24:49, June 11, 2008 CET
From Obshestvo Stroiteley Terri
ToDebating the Tsarism
MessageNow, this is totally unacceptable and Socialie Anarhisti will make a demonstrations nationwide to object this. We believe far more people than those who voted for us are totally against this legislation.
This information will be sent to our troops worldwide so that those soldiers whose families do not own land will notice and will decide how much effort should they add to their warfare for country who betrayed them. I believe that will be a big loss for our war potential.
We call for peaceful civil disobedience from town people, from soldiers and from other interest groups in case these Articles are approved.

Date20:49:11, June 11, 2008 CET
From East Trigunia Company
ToDebating the Tsarism
MessageWe believe all should be allowed citizenship, but landowners and aristocrats be 1st class citizens and have more rights.

Date23:51:12, June 11, 2008 CET
From Family and Tradition Party (disbanded)
ToDebating the Tsarism
MessageWe agree with the Christian Soldiers - we want everyone to have the right to citizenship, but we would be willing to allow land-owners more rights than citizens who don't own land. Perhaps suffrage should only be allowed to those who own land, and therefore have more of a vested interest in the politics of Trigunia? Or perhaps land-owners votes could count for more than citizens who do not own land - for example, a non-land owning citizen's vote could be worth half of a land-owners vote.
We like the spirit of article 1, but cannot accept it in its current form. We will be willing to negotiate further on the issue of land-owners rights, however.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes

    Total Seats: 0

    no
        

    Total Seats: 464

    abstain
     

    Total Seats: 91


    Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy.

    Random quote: "It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." - Aristotle

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 59