We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: DSP.193.2590
Details
Submitted by[?]: 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2591
Description[?]:
| "Sed ut perspiciatis unde omnis iste natus error sit voluptatem accusantium doloremque laudantium, totam rem aperiam, eaque ipsa quae ab illo inventore veritatis et quasi architecto beatae vitae dicta sunt explicabo. Nemo enim ipsam voluptatem quia voluptas sit aspernatur aut odit aut fugit, sed quia consequuntur magni dolores eos qui ratione voluptatem sequi nesciunt. Neque porro quisquam est, qui dolorem ipsum quia dolor sit amet, consectetur, adipisci velit, sed quia non numquam eius modi tempora incidunt ut labore et dolore magnam aliquam quaerat voluptatem. Ut enim ad minima veniam, quis nostrum exercitationem ullam corporis suscipit laboriosam, nisi ut aliquid ex ea commodi consequatur? Quis autem vel eum iure reprehenderit qui in ea voluptate velit esse quam nihil molestiae consequatur, vel illum qui dolorem eum fugiat quo voluptas nulla pariatur?" |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning forest protection.
Old value:: Forest protection is left to local governments.
Current: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Proposed: Forests have strictly enforced protection. Felling is limited to fire breaks.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Government regulation of hunting.
Old value:: The matters of hunting and fishing are handled by local governments.
Current: Private hunting and fishing practices are banned.
Proposed: Hunting and fishing activities are restricted to designated areas and periods.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 4
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on tree plantation.
Old value:: Local governments may set plantation policy.
Current: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Proposed: The government requires tree plantation at higher than replacement levels for all logging or clearance operations.
Article 5
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy regarding the keeping of wild animals as pets.
Old value:: This matter is left up to the local governments.
Current: The ownership of wild animals as pets is banned.
Proposed: Wild animals may be kept as pets; the owners of dangerous wild animals must take the necessary measures to ensure they can't escape.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:27:11, June 12, 2008 CET | From |  帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | OOC: I'm tired and in a hurry so instead of a long description you get some random Latin stuff. |
| Date | 11:13:27, June 12, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | We wonder why the Conservatives have conspired with the Socialists to betray the people of Sekowo. |
| Date | 22:48:03, June 12, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | Conspired? No, no. Conservatives don't conspire. We do what we feel is in the best interest of those who voted for us. Our party strongly supports a future for this country. The forest protection, tree replanting and hunting laws are those that the party is supporting. The other two, at the moment, we would rather leave it to local government however we will not object to it having some federal laws pertaining to it. |
| Date | 22:51:08, June 12, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | OOC: NPP, as a matter of fact, CP agrees with DSP 30% of the time. NPP agrees with DSP 32% of the time. Now who really is conspiring here? =D |
| Date | 23:55:36, June 12, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | [[This just seems like such an unlikely thing for the conservatives to agree with the socialists on: in essence, the conservatives are voting for socialism in this case.]] |
| Date | 01:39:32, June 13, 2008 CET | From | Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | OOC: Even if he voted no, it'd still pass, so it doesn't really matter. |
| Date | 02:48:07, June 13, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | OOC: Socialism is an economic system, protecting the environment transcends economic systems, so I would'nt say it's a socialist proposition. |
| Date | 17:09:49, June 13, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | OOC: You're dead wrong. Socialism is also the regulation of government. And, frankly, the enforcement of socialism is to kill many jobs, many industries. There is a responsibility to protect the environment, but not from the federal level, and not by government. Society in every state is a blessing, but government, even in its best sense, is but a necessary evil. (Paraphrasing Paine here. Not enough time to look up the quote. I think the only difference is the 'its' Correct me if I'm wrong.) |
| Date | 08:36:12, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Conservative Party | To | Debating the DSP.193.2590 |
| Message | NPP, we are voting in favour for environmental reasons. We are conservatives, not ultra right-wing fanatics. Again, it comes down to what 'conservative' means. However, there are certain forms of socialism which is good: free public health care system and free public education. The CP is a reasonable party that stands for the best policies. ;-) Just in majority, our values lean toward the right. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 342 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 258 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The grey space in the east is populated by the forum-based countries, known in-game as the former colonies or the "Third World". These countries are managed by the Third World Coordinator but players can request control of individual countries in the Third World Control Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8302 |
| Random quote: "Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom." - Albert Einstein |