We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Anti-Nuclear bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Seosavists Republican party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: December 2116
Description[?]:
| . |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:09:49, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | No. No matter how dark times may seem, we still need nukes to protect ourselves. |
| Date | 05:10:19, September 24, 2005 CET | From | Luthori Green Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | The dark times are caused by the nukes, among other bad legislation. |
| Date | 15:11:01, September 24, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | You're wrong. Our independent nuclear deterrent protects our sovereinty. If we didn't have them by the time warfare was introduced our time as an independent state would be numbered. |
| Date | 15:12:27, September 24, 2005 CET | From | Seosavists Republican party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | protect ourselves from what? Heck at the moment I think we'd benifit from invasion. |
| Date | 15:19:26, September 24, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | Then perhaps you should leave, traitor! |
| Date | 10:27:07, September 25, 2005 CET | From | International Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | traitor to who? freedom? democracy? or is he a traitor to your idiocy? DUP, take a look at some of the laws in your nation. there is only one other nation that is as restrictive as you: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewvariable.php?variable=MARRIAGE there is only one nation more restrictive than you: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewvariable.php?variable=SODOMY you are one of three with this option, and only one has a more orwellian setting than you: http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewvariable.php?variable=MILITARY_POLICE that's why i left this hellhole: the only place worse on the entire planet to live is the Republic of Cobura, and they are only that bad because they are a new nation and only one party has had the time to make any laws so far. by this time next week, they will be on a level track, too. if you guys were invaded, no matter who did it, you would be better off than you are now. i just decided to be proactive about it: if i can't bring the freedoms to me, i might as well go to where the freedoms are. |
| Date | 14:50:44, September 25, 2005 CET | From | Social Calvinist Unionist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | No, the dark times are NOT caused by nukes. They are caused by Theocracy. |
| Date | 01:58:37, September 27, 2005 CET | From | United Conservative Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | Out traitor! OUT! |
| Date | 08:24:04, September 27, 2005 CET | From | International Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | I have always been loyal to the ideals of the Commonwealth of Luthori. That's why i left when it died. and if demanding my exiting this debate is your only answer to the points i bring up, then you really have lost. |
| Date | 14:31:13, September 27, 2005 CET | From | Covenanters (IA) | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | You do realise that by going to a nation with all left-wing parties you are just asking for the same thing to happen to you again that happened here? As soon a right-wing party comes along the people will flock to them and they will immediately pick up about half the seats. The electorate are pretty much evenly split on most issues, so the 7 socialist parties will have 1/14th of the vote each and a sole right-wing contender will pick up the other 50%. Well done! |
| Date | 16:42:48, September 27, 2005 CET | From | International Forwardist Party | To | Debating the Anti-Nuclear bill |
| Message | Dundorf does not have all left wing parties. most of the competition in Dundorf is between the communists and the capitalists, so it's not as much about civil rights as it was here, but more about economic ones. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 271 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 479 | |||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: “Tell these old, grey men that their time is over. Tell them to give us back our future, and then get lost!” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |