We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Liberty Reform Act -i
Details
Submitted by[?]: Union Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: April 2592
Description[?]:
| To streamline to court system, and preserve liberty, we propose the following reform. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's position towards the administration of law.
Old value:: There are regional courts that have jurisdiction over questions of regional law and national courts that have jurisdiction over questions of national law.
Current: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Proposed: There are regional courts, but decisions of regional courts may be appealed to national courts (if the right to appeal exists).
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 08:10:49, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Federal Republican Party (UCF) | To | Debating the Liberty Reform Act -i |
| Message | This is useless bureaucracy and a centralization of powers. We thought the MAU was against this! |
| Date | 15:21:54, June 14, 2008 CET | From | Union Party | To | Debating the Liberty Reform Act -i |
| Message | The Progressive Party proposed this bill. It is actually decentralization: This ensures that national courts will not declare everything to be in their jurisdiction. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 89 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 112 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Never use the same password as a friend. If two or more active accounts use the same password, they will be inactivated. |
| Random quote: "The National Rifle Association says, 'Guns don't kill people; people kill people,' but I think the gun helps." - Eddie Izzard |