We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Egelion Party Gated Communities Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: National Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2116
Description[?]:
| We propose that private companies are allowed to build 'gated' communities. Furthermore we propose that the council housing that the Egelion Party successfully introduced to be built for poor people, should also be gated, so as to prevent anti-social behaviour, such as drug dealing, and more petty criminal activity. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: No gated communities are allowed.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 19:38:41, September 23, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Coalition of Egelion | To | Debating the Egelion Party Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | We will support this measure. |
| Date | 02:40:19, September 24, 2005 CET | From | New Libertarian Socialist Union | To | Debating the Egelion Party Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | We do not support the privatisation of neighbourhoods and communities and will not allow this bill to pass! |
| Date | 21:47:40, September 24, 2005 CET | From | National Party | To | Debating the Egelion Party Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | Have you actually read the bill? This has nothing to do with privatisation of neighbourhoods, and it was the Egelion Party that created the legislation that led to the government building public housing anyway. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 312 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 438 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes |