We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2592
Description[?]:
| Government gated communities would help protect ministers and their families from violent opposition militants and ensure foreigner embassies and their personnel protection. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning gated communities.
Old value:: The private sector can set up gated communities.
Current: No gated communities are allowed.
Proposed: Both the government and the private sector can set up gated communities.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:41:28, June 14, 2008 CET | From |  Revolutionary State Socialist Party | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | We support. |
| Date | 04:50:42, June 15, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | We are vehemently against. |
| Date | 12:53:27, June 15, 2008 CET | From | Normand Pluralist Party | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | Why not? |
| Date | 18:29:58, June 15, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | Yes, let's hear it. |
| Date | 06:27:28, June 16, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | Explain, DSP. I'd like to hear the counter argument before voting. |
| Date | 08:56:06, June 16, 2008 CET | From | 帝国公明党 (Teikoku Kōmeitō) | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | Because gated communities are counter to the idea of equality, and allowing the government to set them up shows that the government is counter to the ideals of equality. |
| Date | 16:51:22, June 16, 2008 CET | From | Anti-Federalists of Free Sekowo | To | Debating the CP.0116.2591 Gov't Gated Communities Bill |
| Message | So we are balancing security with the principles of equality. The question, then, is that if we aren't going to use these gated communities (which would become targets, but could be protected) how are we going to protect from Trigunian saboteurs. If we can have a better proposition, we would support. It may need be that some ministers remain in bunkers, but that seems a bit extreme, all things considered. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 231 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 205 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 164 |
| Random fact: Your user name is not your party name. Choose a concise and easy to remember user name. You can change your party name at any point in time later in the game. |
| Random quote: "Abolition of a woman's right to abortion, when and if she wants it, amounts to compulsory maternity: a form of rape by the State." - Edward Abbey |