We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Post Office Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Unity Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2592
Description[?]:
As new (to become) conductors of Infrastructure, we would like to propose the changes below. We feel, that we can allow private postal services, still needing a state owned one. With regulation, these won't hurt the national postal services, but will bring in some race in the economy, and will provide an alternative for those, who don't feel the national postal service is the best choice. Still, it will be limited. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the post office
Old value:: There is a nationalised post office agency in the nation. Private ones are banned.
Current: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Proposed: There is a nationalised post office agency. Private post offices are allowed to exist but the services provided by them are regulated.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 12:55:43, June 15, 2008 CET | From | Hippie Union | To | Debating the Post Office Bill |
Message | Vote: Yes. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 690 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 56 | ||||||
abstain |
Total Seats: 4 |
Random fact: Any RP law granting extraordinary "emergency powers" or dictator-like powers to a government must be passed by at least a 2/3rds majority, but (like all RP laws) may always be overturned by a simple majority vote of the legislature. |
Random quote: "Perhaps the fact that we have seen millions voting themselves into complete dependence on a tyrant has made our generation understand that to choose one's government is not necessarily to secure freedom." - Friedrich Hayek |