We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reclaim the Streets
Details
Submitted by[?]: Kommunisticheskiy Komitet Rabochih
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2593
Description[?]:
The government in this country has far too much power. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Current: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Proposed: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Curfew policy (curfew time to be determined in the bill description).
Old value:: Local governments may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Current: The national government may impose curfews, but only if a state of emergency has been declared.
Proposed: No curfew policies may be established.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 16:21:07, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Partija Kontr-Revoljucionerov | To | Debating the Reclaim the Streets |
Message | Although we support, the current proposals are hardly excessive. |
Date | 16:23:32, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Kommunisticheskiy Komitet Rabochih | To | Debating the Reclaim the Streets |
Message | Perhaps not in terms of a democratic and accountable government - in the hands of the current Tsarist regime that has demonstrated its opposition to human rights and democracy it can be used to excesses. |
Date | 16:27:34, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Partija Kontr-Revoljucionerov | To | Debating the Reclaim the Streets |
Message | No state of emergency has been declaredand the police dispersing groups that pose a risk to public safety isn't exactly an undesirable policy to have. |
Date | 16:46:25, June 17, 2008 CET | From | Kommunisticheskiy Komitet Rabochih | To | Debating the Reclaim the Streets |
Message | Public safety is a subjective thing - your government has made it clear that you think the very idea of people challenging the rigid Tsarist autocracy is a threat to public safety. What is to stop the police applying this policy in the form of oppressing anti-monarchist demos? And why exactly are you defending a policy you are voting against? |
Date | 03:13:16, June 18, 2008 CET | From | Family and Tradition Party (disbanded) | To | Debating the Reclaim the Streets |
Message | The DLP want to reduce our streets to riotous anarchy by stripping the authorities of any legal capacity to stop such chaotic behaviour. The DLP have shown that they place the rights of riff-raff to run wild in the streets above the rights of safety for the innocent public. They therefore sponsor unstablising and uncivil behaviour in public, and sponsor the direct threat of public safety. This is absolutely outrageous and unacceptable. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 331 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 224 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
Random quote: "I believe in an America where millions of Americans believe in an America that's the America millions of Americans believe in. That's the America I love." - Mitt Romney |